Review Criteria
All submitted papers will go through a **double-blind peer review process** to ensure academic integrity and high-quality research contributions. The review process will be conducted by a panel of experts in the respective domains.
Evaluation Parameters
Papers will be evaluated based on:
- Originality and novelty of research
- Technical and theoretical depth
- Clarity and structure of the manuscript
- Relevance to the conference themes
- Scientific and practical impact
Submission & Decision
Authors will receive feedback based on reviewers’ recommendations. Papers will be categorized as:
- **Accepted** – No major revisions required.
- **Accepted with Minor Revisions** – Requires minor updates before final submission.
- **Accepted with Major Revisions** – Requires substantial modifications.
- **Rejected** – Does not meet the conference standards.
Publication Ethics
All authors must adhere to ethical publication standards. Plagiarism or duplicate submissions will lead to immediate rejection.
